<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.adv-radio-sci.net/inc/ars/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Advances in Radio Science</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.adv-radio-sci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1684-9965</issn>
		<eissn>1684-9973</eissn>
		<volume_number>5</volume_number>
		<volume_title>Kleinheubacher Berichte 2006</volume_title>
		<publication_year>2007</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/ars-5-1-2007</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.adv-radio-sci.net/5/1/2007/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.adv-radio-sci.net/5/1/2007/ars-5-1-2007.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.adv-radio-sci.net/5/1/2007/ars-5-1-2007.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>1</start_page>
	<end_page>4</end_page>
	<publication_date>2007-06-12</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Different biological effectiveness of ionising and non-ionising radiations in mammalian cells</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>E. Schmid</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2">
			<name>T. Schrader</name>
			<email>thorsten.schrader@ptb.de</email>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">University of Munich, Radiobiological Institute, 80336 Munich, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), 38116 Braunschweig, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">It has been discussed ever since among the scientific communities, whether
non-ionising radiation can alter or harm biological systems. While the
mechanisms of underlying effects of ionising radiation are well understood
and described here, there is less understanding in the effects caused by
non-ionising radiation except for heating effects. Recent results have been
interpreted, that numerical chromosome aberrations may be induced by
exposure to RF radiation. Our own experiments employing the &amp;micro;TEM cell
yield results similar to findings observed for aneugenic-inducing chemical
agents which can cause spindle disturbances. For comparison purpose to the
effects caused by those agents we used the well established human-hamster
hybrid (A&lt;sub&gt;L&lt;/sub&gt;) cell line to evaluate the biological effects after exposure
to RF radiation (835 MHz).</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Crawford, M. L.: Generation of Standard EM Fields Using TEM Transmission Cells, IEEE Trans. EMC, EMC-16, 189&amp;ndash;195, 1974. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> ICNIRP Guidelines: Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz), Health Phys., 74, 494&amp;ndash;522, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> ICRP: Relative biological effectiveness (RBE), quality factor ($Q$), and radiation weighting factor ($w_R)$, edited by: Valentin, J., ICRP Publication, 92, Elsevier Inc. New York, USA, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> IEGMP: Independent Expert Group on Mobile Phone, IEGMP, Mobile phones and health, NRPB, UK, http://www.iegmp.org.uk, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> NRC: Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation, BEIR VII, Phase 2, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., USA, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Krumrey, M., Ulm, G., and Schmid, E.: Dicentric chromosomes in monolayers of human lymphocytes produced by monochromatized synchrotron radiation with photon energies from 1.83 keV to 17.4 keV, Radiat. Environ. Biophys., 43, 1&amp;ndash;6, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Mashevich, M., Folkman, D., Kesar, A., Barbul, A., Korenstein, R., Jerbi, E., and Avivi, L.: Exposure of human peripheral blood lymphocytes to electromagnetic fields associated with cellular phones leads to chromosomal instability, Bioelectromagn., 24, 82&amp;ndash;90, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Moulder, J. E., Foster, K. R., Erdreich, L. S., and McNamee, J. P.: Mobile phones, mobile phone base stations and cancer: a review, Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 81, 189&amp;ndash;203, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Schmid, E., Bauchinger, M., Bunde, E., Ferbert, H. F., and von Lieven, H.: Comparison of the chromosome damage and its dose-response after medical whole-body exposure to $^60$ Co $\gamma $-rays and irradiation of blood in vitro, Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 26, 31&amp;ndash;37, 1974. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Schmid, E., Schlegel, D., Guldbakke, S., Kapsch, R. P., and Regulla, D.: RBE of nearly monoenergetic neutrons at energies of 36 keV&amp;ndash;14.6 MeV for induction of dicentrics in human lymphocytes, Radiat. Environ. Biophys., 42, 87&amp;ndash;94, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Tice, R. R., Hook, G. G., Donner, M., McRee, D. I., and Guy, A. W.: Genotoxicity of radiofrequency signals. I.Investigation of DNA damage and micronuclei induction in cultured human blood lymphocytes, Bioelectromagn., 23, 113&amp;ndash;126, 2002. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

