<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.adv-radio-sci.net/inc/ars/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Advances in Radio Science</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.adv-radio-sci.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1684-9965</issn>
		<eissn>1684-9973</eissn>
		<volume_number>3</volume_number>
		<volume_title>Kleinheubacher Berichte 2004</volume_title>
		<publication_year>2005</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/ars-3-105-2005</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.adv-radio-sci.net/3/105/2005/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.adv-radio-sci.net/3/105/2005/ars-3-105-2005.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.adv-radio-sci.net/3/105/2005/ars-3-105-2005.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>105</start_page>
	<end_page>109</end_page>
	<publication_date>2005-05-12</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty of Radiated EMC Tests in Arbitrary Field Generators using Surface Currents on DUT</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>T. Schrader</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>K. Münter</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>M. Spitzer</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="2">
			<name>N. Eulig</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="2">
			<name>A. Enders</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, AG 2.21, Bundesallee 100, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Institut f&amp;#x00FC;r Elektromagnetische Vertr&amp;#x00E4;glichkeit, Technische Universit&amp;#x00E4;t Braunschweig, Schleinitzstraße 23, 38106</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">We present a method for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty in
radiated EMC tests. It is based on the measurement of surface current
densities on a sphere, the results are compared to the surface current
distribution on a sphere in a free-space environment obtained by numerical
calculations. The free-space is considered to be a reference field
generator. By this method we avoid burdening any systematic deviations of
one particular (historic) method to any of the others. We evaluate the ratio
&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;J/E&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; of the measured surface current density  &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;J&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; and the measured empty electrical
field strength &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;E&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; for both the reverberation chamber and the semi-anechoic
chamber.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

